Perfil de ioioWint's spaceFotosBlogListas Herramientas Ayuda

Blog


23 marzo

conditions apply

am scribbling all fucking things wat i feel like shouting to some one.. nothing specific to any bugger nigger or fucker out thr.. its ma personal opinion..  i prefer to tak th cases if any in th US court of law , js ma personal opinion tat its quite sensible system.. do note.. the fucker who sues me is to pay the busines class air ticket TWO Way.. n fr ma accomodation.. ;)
22 marzo

y not hav something similar to CMM rating to fucking clients too..

wat the heck do u gain on having the software companies to b alone rated 1, 2 , 3, 5 or million CMM .. the develpers or developing companies improving their standards shall help to a certain extent bt not everything is with the development side alone!!

wat if the fucking requirement gets changed.. we start wit something n finaly even while developing, the requirements keep changing.. the CR-Change Requests never cease evn on the day of the delivery or drop in many companies..
its th same story across all places!

if the companies producing softwares are boot licking natured.. thn this s not gona change even in a  million years! some measure is to be taken atleast form the develping companies side.. they should try to streamline the activities of the clients, n not try to suck a penny for every move form the client.

y not hav some rating to the clients who can come up wit wat they want in a perfect shot atleast after some days of discussion or some shit.. allow a % of changes evn thn it wil be far far btr than wats its for today..

am not saying the dev is geting to know everything that the client is thinking.. bt then assuming on the pessimistic tat he has not got 100% of th initial requirement, then wit this shit.. if u keep on changing even while the devlopment is going on.. how the fuck do u expect things to go perfectly... if u ask me i wil definitely bet ma ass its not poossible tat u get wat u wanted!!!  u didnt get everything form the  gal u dated fr years.. then how could u justify tat u gona get it now in this scenario!!

n one more funny thing is... wit all this shit.. u expect the devs to give u a 100% working N ZERO defect software.. are u insane!!!!!! how th hell s it possible.. its worth having it as an ambition that u wil deliver a bug free.. bt the poor dev has developed something tats told to him.. n tats not wats expected from the requirements the client has specified.. on the whole its like driving safely in fucking indian roads baby.. u should pray hard tat others should folow traffic rules n they shouldnt hit u while on the other hand  should also drive carefuly..

bring some standardization to the Clients, not all gals wit boobs n puzzy can b dated similarly not all fuckers who want something n who lack the ability to think or who can seldom express to the devs or atleast take efforts to help the devs to satisfy u are fit to be clients.. plz head some where.. dnt head to any dev comapnies with XYZ CMM.. they cant help u.. until u try to help urself out..

night mare wit XMLHttprequest object!

for some crazy issues i was asked to strip down my ajaxified asp.net app to a normal aspx with explicit usage of xmlhttp request object.
god save ma ass, tat was a mind blowing shit experience with tat XMLhttprequest object. am not tat expert on ajax programming, bt thn the code i had used to get things done had to be modified on all the machines individualy to get it shake its ass n boobs..
same code had different issues in each system..

finaly deploying the working copy on the IIS was an utter flop.. the fucking browser + IIS combination was treating any of my GET requests thro XMLhttp request object as same! n showing me the result of the first XMlhttprequest objects result.

some geeks had an idea to add a random no. as the query string so tat i can let the browser feel as if i am going fr a new request each time.. i was nt satisfied of this approach, finaly getin into POST request fixed the issue!

infact i went to hav a handler ashx file to handle ma xmlhttprequst objects request.. didnt wana trouble ma existing aspx page.. n i prefered to modularize ma async handling wit ma existing stuf, coz i cant trust the requirements its ever changing.. cant curs em, coz th changing requirement shit is th only thing tat brings more work n money to many companies.. indirectly it turns out to be a bread winner ryt ;)